| Micro-channel |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Medical equipment procurement, please do not discriminate against low bid! |
| |
| Author：中國銘鉉 企劃部 Release Time：2017-9-1 10:58:47 Number Browse：788 |
| |
On September 1, 2017, a number of typical cases, such as "1 yuan bid" and "1 point winning bid", in the domestic government procurement area, have aroused strong reactions in the industry.
The low - price "snatch" bid, which has been in the bidding process, has gradually become a focus and hotspot issue in the procurement field.
In fact, the low price "grab" standard also happens in the medical equipment procurement field, because it has two sides, how to deal with scientific norms is a difficult problem before the procurement agency.
To this, the author combines the practice experience of medical equipment procurement to talk about view.
The determination of the low price "grab" standard basis
(1) "the measures for the administration of military material procurement review: with the provisions of article 13 of the" approval of review and adjudication board (more than four 5 of the judges), the lowest quotation or important quote separately obviously unreasonable or below cost, may affect the product quality and good faith, the performance of the review committee shall require suppliers provide written documents within the prescribed time limit shall be explanation, and submit the relevant certificates.
If the supplier fails to make a reasonable explanation or fails to provide relevant supporting documents within the prescribed time limit, the review committee shall reject its bid (bid) and deal with it in an invalid bid (quotation).
(2) the government procurement tendering and bidding management measures for the goods and services (finance ministry make no. 87), article 60 regulation: "the bid evaluation committee believe that the bidder price obviously lower than other bidders offer, through compliance review may affect product quality or not good faith, the performance of shall require it at the scene of the bid assessment provide written instructions within a reasonable time, submit the relevant documents when necessary;If the bidder fails to prove the rationality of its offer, the bid evaluation committee shall treat it as an invalid tender.
Low price "grab" standard case analysis
Case description: A hospital intends to purchase 1 set of endoscopic management of PACS system, budget of $800000, A total of A, B, C, D four companies bidding, and passed qualification and compliance review.When the bid is opened, the bid price of A company is 680,000 yuan, the bid price of company B is 550,000 yuan, and the bidding price of company C is 500,000 yuan, and the bid price of company D is 80,000 yuan.
Case analysis: in view of D company bid price obviously lower than other three factories, the review committee has decided that the company may be lower than the cost bid, emphasis should review the project technology parameters, the commerce clause is in accordance with the project requirements, shall require written instructions issued by the quality of the products at the scene of the bidding company and the performance bond, and promised to cannot be bound to any other items, the port is open free of charge, the warranty period free software upgrades, and shall determine the quality assurance period after maintenance upgrade costs, maximize the performance risk control.
Case processing: review of the review committee, the product technical parameters meet the demand of the unit, and are mature products, the larger the market share, the company within the prescribed time submit the written instructions and performance bond, the product quality and confirmed by the user representatives to sign.
After verification, there is no late bundle sales behavior, the product late operation cost is clear, the performance risk is controllable.According to the relevant laws and regulations, the bid evaluation committee has decided that D company will be effective in bidding for the project.
Low - price "grab" standard identification method
In the above cases, we briefly summarized the methods and steps to deal with such tenders:
If I found a firm bid price obviously lower than the prices, other companies should focus on review the product technical parameters, the commerce clause whether meet the project requirements, prevent the shoddy, "bad money after bad money".In case the parameters fail to meet the requirements of use, the bidding shall be made in accordance with the project requirements and bid evaluation criteria.
To view the project operating costs, such as whether bundling consumables (reagent), with or without other auxiliary equipment, how about the price of wearing parts, later maintenance, warranty, quality inspection, training expenses, whether the network port open and so on.In order to obtain significant economic benefits, the bidder shall make an invalid bid.
The bid assessment committee shall request the bidding company provide written instructions within a reasonable time at the scene of the bid assessment and submit relevant documents when necessary, review the company's product sales market situation as well as the performance guarantee ability.If there is a performance risk, an invalid tender shall be made.
After the bidding situation is announced and the results of the winning bid are announced, if any other companies have raised questions, they should attach great importance to it and analyze it seriously.After the bidding is over, the market research should be conducted again, and the purchase contract will be signed after the use of the unit.
Determination of low price "grab" mark matters
(1) for medical equipment with special consumable materials (reagents), for the purpose of obtaining the subsequent economic benefits, it is easy to take a low price "snatch" bid for such equipment bidding.In the preparation of the evaluation standard, the subsequent operating costs should be considered, so that the bid company should be prevented from driving down the price of equipment and driving up the price of consumables.
It can be changed to competitive negotiation procurement for the complicated and used medical equipment of supporting materials (reagents).At the same time, the price of consumables (reagents) should also be investigated in market price.
(2) for medical devices that do not bring special consumables (reagents), they should focus on the manufacturer's ability to perform the contract, whether it disrupts the market or malicious bidding.In terms of the contract, it is necessary to avoid the risk caused by the company's failure to perform the contract after the administrative penalty.
(3) such an extreme case of advice to give disciplinary inspection, audit and purchasing management department for the record the examination and approval, legal advisers of complicated conditions should entrust to control, maximum limit reduces the risk of purchasing department.
(4) it is important to note that a new version of the government procurement of goods and services in tendering and bidding management method "regulation, also can be in the purchase, the highest price within the budget set reasonable but not set a minimum price.
Therefore, it is not allowed to reject the low price tender and not to treat the low bidder with discriminatory or discriminatory treatment.Therefore, it should be reasonable to deal with the problem of low price bidding, so as to avoid unnecessary questions and statements.
From the current situation, the future also may often take the case of low price bidding.Let's not be afraid of the low price "grab" bid. When it comes to low price or even super low price "grab", a simple judgment is that it is not likely to be a round mark, but the result of market competition.
However, we should realize that the low price bidding has two sides and the purchasing agencies should pay more attention to the process.If mishandled, it could lead to negative publicity and negative publicity.
However, if appropriate, it can save purchasing funds, highlight the fairness and standardization of the procurement process, and increase the sense of achievement of procurement.
Therefore, as long as the clear project requirements before bidding, bid assessment standards, the principle of the bid, according to the laws and regulations in the process of review scientific process, strengthen the market research, after review the bidding results stand the historical inspection, can with changeless should change, make the purchasing work is always in the invincible position.
|
| |
Previous article：Pharmaceutical companies enter the top 500 manufacturing industries in China
Next article：The report shows that the medical device industry has stable growth risk and investment stability
|
| |
|
|
